Tax Savings: Estate Planning “Coupons”

Under current gift and estate tax law, if you pay a gift or estate tax, it will be at a flat rate of 40%. Forty percent. But most people will never pay that rate, or any rate at all, because their estates are not large enough and what estate or gift taxes they could have to pay, they can pay with coupons.

Now, the IRS doesn’t call them coupons, but coupons they are. Here’s how they work.

couponsSay you and your spouse have four children. Together, you could give each of them $28,000 a year, and you would pay no gift tax on those gifts. That’s because the IRS grants each of you a coupon worth $14,000 each year, a coupon the IRS calls an “annual exclusion.” You can use as many of those $14,000 coupons as you want ($28,000 if done jointly as spouses). Got 10 friends? You’ve got 10 coupons. Got 20? You’ve can give away $280,000 total to them and pay no gift tax.

But what if you want to give your favorite son or daughter $50,000 one year? Surely there’s a tax there, right? Probably not. You see, Uncle Sam has also given each of us a lifetime, but reducing, coupon of $5,450,000 (in 2016; it’s adjusted for inflation each year), a coupon the IRS calls the Applicable Exclusion Amount or AEA. Thus, the math in the example I just described would be $50,000 – $14,000 – $14,000 = $22,000. You could either pay the gift tax on the $22,000 or subtract it from your lifetime coupon: $5,450,000 – $22,000 = $5,428,000 remaining on your lifetime coupon. That is, the AEA reduces each time you have to use some of it to cover gifts in excess of your annual exclusion amounts.

You can use your lifetime coupon while you’re alive or save it all till you die to pay any estate tax you may yet owe. As I said at the beginning, that won’t be much if any for most people because we won’t have estates that large. (And if you’ve been paying attention, you’ll realize that for a married couple, their estate would have to be almost $11,000,000 before they’d have to pay any estate tax under current law.)

There are other coupons as well. A gift to charity? Use an unlimited coupon. A gift to your spouse? Unlimited as well–unless your spouse is not a citizen of the United States, then it’s only $145,000 per year. Pay your children’s education and medical expenses directly–that is directly to the school or hospital–use an unlimited coupon.

Neat, huh? And I haven’t even discussed portability yet. I’ll save that for later.

Quote for the Day

“If you get up early, work late, and pay your taxes, you will get ahead–if you strike oil.”

J. Paul Getty

Trusts: You Can Avoid Probate, but You Can’t Avoid (All) the Costs

Onassis_NYTThere’s a misconception out there that if you use a revocable living trust in your estate planning, you avoid probate and save on all those costs associated with probate. Well, maybe and maybe not.

First, in order to avoid probate, virtually everything you own has to be owned in a way that will do just that–avoid probate. Sounds circular, I know. What I mean is that if you own property

  1. As joint tenants with rights of survivorship–it will avoid probate.
  2. In so-called POD or Payable on Death accounts–it will avoid probate.
  3. That allows for you to name beneficiaries–a life insurance policy, for example–it will avoid probate.
  4. In a revocable trust–it will avoid probate.
  5. That doesn’t amount to much–you may avoid probate, or at least be eligible for some sort of simplified probate.

Put all that together, and you may avoid probate. But if you have a will, it will need to be proved valid in court–usually a routine process. If you own property that doesn’t fall in one of the categories I just listed, it will probably have to go through probate.

Bottom line, you may be able to avoid probate if you do everything right, own all of your property correctly, dot all your “i’s” and cross all your “t’s.” But if you don’t . . .

That said, to the extent that you do own your property as described above, you reap the big benefit of probate: You keep things private. For example, if your will says who gets the Picasso that hangs over the fireplace and who gets the cabin in the mountains when you die, anybody with the time to go down to the court and check can find that out. If, however, you say who gets what in your revocable trust, nobody has to know except for the people receiving the property. Maintaining your family’s privacy and saving time are the main benefits of avoiding probate to the degree possible. Don’t believe me? Ask Jackie Onassis’s family.

Now, about those costs. Yes, there are costs to probate. Attorney’s fees. Executor’s fees. Court costs. They all add up and can be expensive. But you know what, it costs money to administer a trust when you die: Attorney’s fees, again. Trustee’s fees, again. But typically no court costs. So yes, your estate will probably save money by avoiding probate, but your estate will still spend some money.

One more thing, a thing about revocable living trusts as an estate planning tool: They are predictable. You set them up. You outline all your plans, appoint trustees you trust, and tell them what you want them to do–in writing–and it’s all so predictable and happens almost seamlessly.

You turn that all over to the court in a probate proceeding, and predictability goes out the window.

Revocable living trusts are the way to go–for most people.

Quote for the Day

“Money-giving is a very good criterion, in a way, of a person’s mental health. Generous people are rarely mentally ill people.”

Dr. Karl Menniger, Forbes magazine.

NFA Firearms in an Estate: What’s an Executor (or Trustee?) to Do?

Question Mark_YellowYou’re the executor or personal representative of an estate (they’re the same thing, by the way) or a trustee of a trust. The owner of some NFA firearms has died, and you’re left to deal with the aftermath. (Of course, the real “owner” of any NFA arms in a trust is the trustee, but generally, the initial trustee is the grantor of the trust, who we on the outside looking in, view as the owner.) What can you do with the NFA firearms? If you turn them over to the decedent’s heir under the will or the beneficiaries of his trust, do you have to pay the transfer tax?

Fortunately, the BATFE has been fairly helpful on this point, though it could have been more clear. On September 5, 199, the Bureau issued a letter in which it said the following:

If there are unregistered NFA firearms in the estate, these firearms are contraband and cannot be registered by the estate. The executor of the estate should contact the local ATF office to arrange for the abandonment of the unregistered firearms.

So now you know what to do with unregistered NFA items–if you’re an “executor of the estate,” that is. Did the Bureau also mean “trustee of a trust”? Maybe. Later in the same letter, after the word “heir” has been repeated a number of times, we do see this language:

NFA firearms may be transferred directly interstate to a beneficiary of the estate.

Beneficiary. Is that the same as an heir? Though they are often used interchangeably, the two terms are not precise synonyms. Often the word heir is use to define someone who receives property under a will or via a state’s intestacy laws. Beneficiary, on the other hand, is just as often used to describe someone who receives property under trust. Again, they are also used interchangeably. How is the BATFE using the terms in this letter? Inquiring minds would like to know. Maybe this line from the letter helps,

A lawful heir is anyone named in the decedent’s will or, in the absence of a will, anyone entitled to inherit under the laws of the State in which the decedent last resided. (emphasis supplied)

Hmmm. This sounds like intestacy, but is that all? Does “under the laws of the State” mean the same thing as “operation of law” (see below)?

Well, recently, the Bureau issued the final Rule 41F, which affects so-call NFA or gun trusts, among other things:

It [the new rule] also adds a new section to ATF’s regulations to address the possession and transfer of firearms registered to a decedent. The new section clarifies that the executor, administrator, personal representative, or other person authorized under State law to dispose of property in an estate may possess a firearm registered to a decedent during the term of probate without such possession being treated as a “transfer” under the NF A. It also specifies that the transfer of the firearm to any beneficiary of the estate may be made on a tax-exempt basis. (emphasis supplied)

Such transfers are not taxable transfers because they are not “voluntary”; that is, the executor, personal representative, etc. must follow the terms of the will (or trust?) or law. He or she has no choice. That’s all fine and dandy, but are transfers from trust to beneficiaries tax exempt? Come on. Tell us BATFE. You can do it.

In the commentary on the new rule, the Bureau gets a clear as it’s probably going to get in answering that question, when it says:

Transfers of NFA firearms from an estate to a lawful heir are necessary because the deceased registrant can no longer possess the firearm. For this reason, ATF has long considered any transfer necessitated because of death to be involuntary and tax-free when the transfer is made to a lawful heir as designated by the decedent or State law. However, when an NFA firearm is transferred from an estate to a person other than a lawful heir, it is considered a voluntary transfer because the decision has been made to transfer the firearm to a person who would not take possession as a matter of law. Such transfers cannot be considered involuntary and should not be exempt from the transfer tax. Other tax-exempt transfers—including those made by operation of law—may be effected by submitting Form 5. Instructions are provided on the form. (emphasis supplied)

Operation of law would seem to include transfers mandated by language in trusts, trusts which are created under state law, laws that include fiduciary standards that compel trustees to carry out the wishes of the grantor of the trust, whose wishes are stated in the language of the trust. I’m hanging my hat on that.

There are a couple of other things I’d do to make sure that hat fits in every circumstance, but I won’t go into that here.

 

Powers of Attorney, Living Wills, and Such: The Problem of Staleness

Remember when you were in your teens and still driving your parents’s cars? Every Friday night, it was the same routine, “Dad, Mom, can I use the car tonight?” And either the keys would come flying your way–or they wouldn’t. But when they did, you were off in a flash and out for the night.

IMG_2773Did you ever try to take advantage of that permission slip a day or two later? You know, as in, “Well, they gave me permission on Friday, it must be okay today”? I’ll bet you tried something like that at least once. I know I did. What was the result?

For me, it was a lecture and, if I recall correctly, my car privileges were revoked or some such. Why? The conditions that prevailed when my parents gave me the keys on Friday no longer existed on Tuesday. Now, Mom needed one car to go to a church function. Dad needed the other car to do business 20 miles away. In other words, my permission slip had grown stale.

Ever eaten stale food? Last night I cooked some boxed scalloped potatoes that were way past their “best-used-by date,” as in five years past. I can still taste the taste of stale in my mouth. Yuck.

Staleness can be a problem with powers of attorney, living wills, and the like as well. According to Jeremiah Barlow, an attorney with WealthCounsel.com, many financial institutions and hospitals won’t accept a power attorney, living will, and other such document if they’re more than two or three years old because, well, conditions may have changed. The principal–the person granting the power to the agent–may no longer have the need for an agent–the person granted the power–to do things for him. Or he may want someone else to do it.

Or, as the financial institution or hospital may be thinking, maybe the power of attorney or living will has been revoked or changed by the principal.

And so, it’s good practice to update–literally–any of those documents you may have signed years ago. Make them fresh again, so your bank or hospital will accept them. Update them, so they work when they’re supposed to.

 

Quote for the Day

Plans to continue the [farming] firm may be frustrated by the lack of a competent management team. This situation may be avoided by taking steps, such as the following, to prepare for the future:

  • Stressing the idea of a team approach to making decisions.
  • Focusing on developing management skills.
  • Emphasizing cross-training.
  • Developing a system of routine communications.
  • Implementing routine, nonthreatening evaluations.
  • Agreeing to share in the general work load of running a farm or ranch.

In one instance, a highly promising plan for the three sons and a son-in-law of a generous father, who was able to pass 160 acres of land to each one debt-free, fell apart in less than a year because none of the four anticipated having to do the laborious work in producing crops, feeding and caring for livestock, and doing the marketing and record keeping involved in a sizeable operation.

Neil E. Harl, attorney, “Farm and RanchEstate (and Business) Planning—Part 1,” Farms and Ranches, (March 2015)

Quote for the Day

 I have shewed you all things, how that so labouring ye ought to support the weak, and to remember the words of the Lord Jesus, how he said, It is more blessed to give than to receive. Acts 20:35

Quote for the Day

“Decanting is the act of distributing the assets of an old trust to a new one with more desirable terms. It provides an easy method for correcting errors or ambiguities, adapting a trust to changes in a settlor’s objectives or changes in a beneficiary’s circumstances, taking advantage of new planning opportunities or adding flexibility to a trust.”

Peter J. Melcher, Robert S. Keebler & Steven J. Oshins, “A Guide to Trust Decanting,” Estate Planing & Taxation, (2015)

What’s on Your Family’s Wish List?

I listened to an interesting seminar yesterday titled “Estate Planning in Agriculture: Protecting a Way of Life” sponsored by WealthCounsel.com. Stan Miller and Robert Serio were the presenters. Serio covered the Farm Service Agency (FSA) Subsidy Programs and the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Programs. He cautioned attorneys to be careful to not to do anything in an estate plan that would cause their farmer and rancher clients to lose benefits under those programs. Quite interesting. I briefly reported on the take-a-way yesterday. 

Then Miller took over beginning with what he called “The Farm Family Wish List”:

  • Don’t disqualify for USDA subsidy payments and other government benefits,
  • Keep the court system of of the family business,
  • Keep the farm in the family forever,
  • Treat non-farming family members fairly,
  • Avoid the need to liquidate the farm in order to pay for the cost of long-term care, and
  • Avoid estate tax.

To that list, I would add “Avoid capital gains tax on appreciated property.”

Does Stan’s list mirror yours? What would you add to it or subtract from it?

More importantly, what have you done to make sure your wish list becomes a reality?

The Wyoming State Bar does not certify any lawyer as a specialist or expert. Anyone considering a lawyer should independently investigate the lawyer’s credentials and ability, and not rely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. This website is an advertisement.