“If you feel like your VC [venture capitalist] is a proctologist, run for the hills.”
Brad Feld and Jason Mendelson, Venture Deals: Be Smarter than Your Lawyer and Venture Capitalist, Wiley 2103
Quote for the Day
Quote for the Day
Actually, this is not a quote but a paraphrase of some information I found the other day on the Internet. Can’t remember the source–I think I may have found it on Farm Bureau website and repeated in a variety of other places, including a Nationwide Insurance brochure I discovered online. With that, this:
Almost 97% of farms in the U.S. are owned by families, and only 11% of those families have succession or transitions plans in place to ensure that the farm stays in family hands after the current owner dies.
Some Things I Learned Answering Questions on a Forum for Asking Legal Questions
So I sometimes forget that everybody’s smart, just on different subjects. For example, I don’t know much about physics. My teachers tried, but my head could only hold so much gravity and speed of light and such. Well, today I was online in an online forum where non-lawyers posed legal questions to attorneys. These were real life people experiencing real life problems that involved the law in some way or the other.
Now let me be crystal clear: I don’t think these people are dumb. To repeat: we are all “smart,” just on different things. I happen to know a lot about the law, but boy am I at a loss about some other subjects (heck, even about some legal subjects). With that, here are a few things I learned while answering questions:
- Many, if not most people, don’t realize that estate taxes are no longer a concern for most of us. Did you know that you and your spouse must be worth almost $11 million before the tax man comes knocking? Yes, you may need to do some planning to make sure you take full advantage of that $11 million threshold, but still.
- Many people don’t realize that the First Amendment doesn’t protect them from employers, friends, parents, and the like from infringing on their free speech rights. No, the First Amendment protects us from the government infringing on our rights. And even then the right is not absolute.
- More than a few people confuse a living will with a plain old will, also known as a last will and testament. A living will is a document that tells your family and doctor whether you want life support and such should you become incapacity and unable to speak for yourself. A will or last will and testament is what you use to appoint guardians for your children and to give your property away when you die. You can read more here.
- A lot of people–especially people down on their luck financially–aren’t aware of the legal resources available to them that are free or at a reduced cost, nor are they aware of the state agencies that might be of help to them–child protective or family services, for example. For the record, in Wyoming you can go to the Wyoming State Bar to find free or reduced-rate legal services. In Utah, you should go here. In Wyoming, you can find child and family services here. In Utah, you’ll find them here.
- Finally, too many people are way too quick to pull the trigger; that is, they get angry and immediately shout “Medic!!!” I mean, “Lawyer!!!” To those I say, try to work out your problems by yourself and amicably first, especially if it’s family, then resort to the law. But the corollary to that is, if the proper response is legal, then hire an attorney. Trust me on that one.
Now where do I go to find out how fast the speed of light was back in the days of horse and buggy?
Why Not Use My Revocable Living Trust as a Gun Trust?
I just took a call from a fellow who asked a very good question: Why not use my revocable living trust as a gun trust? The short answer to that question is, “because.”
But if that’s too short for you, here’s a longer version I gave him–in bullet points:
- Guns are not like virtually any other property. They are regulated. Those regulations come with stiff fines and possible imprisonment if you should accidentally violate them. Gun trusts take that into account. Regular trusts don’t.
- To transfer your home or your bank account, it’s a relatively simple matter of signing a deed or changing the name on the account. You don’t have to worry about who the transferee is and what he’s been up to lately. To transfers any firearms, you always have to be worried about what the transferee has been up to recently or even way back when because if he’s been up to no good, he could be a “prohibited person,” and you could get into trouble for selling or giving your gun to him.
- Transferring–giving or selling–an NFA item is even more problematic. With each and every transfer, there’s fingerprints, photos, forms, signatures, and the like AND a $200 tax AND a long waiting period before you can actually, physically transfer the darn thing. What if when you die or become incapacitated, your trustee doesn’t understand that? Big problems could ensue. (Yes, I know that the transfer tax doesn’t apply when the transfer is from the estate of a decedent to a lawful heir.)
- A well-drafted gun trust takes care of the problems I just described because it comes full of instructions and warnings about the relevant law and issues–guidance, if you will–so your trustee knows what and what not to do.
- A well-drafted gun trust also allows for sharing of NFA items without incurring the wrath of the gun gods. I’ve yet to see a regular revocable living trust that does that.
- Finally, know this: when you buy an NFA item using a trust, you have to send a copy of the complete trust to the BATFE, which keeps it on file. Do you want to send them your revocable living trust that names all your children, speaks of how you want to disinherit your youngest and how you want the gold buried in your backyard to go to your brother Willard and that you want $1,000,000 of your estate to go to the American Red Cross? I wouldn’t either. A well-drafted gun trust won’t disclose that kind of information.
Anyway, that’s why you don’t want to use your regular revocable living trust as a gun trust.
Quote for the Day
Success usually comes to those who are too busy to be looking for it.
Henry David Thoreau
Funding is to Trusts as Fuel is to a Car
I find that people are mystified by trusts. The mention of the word seems to raise mental blocks and other barriers to understanding. It gets even worse when you mention the word “funding” in the same breath as “trust.” Let’s see if I can clarify.
A Trust is Like a Corporation–sort of
For our purposes, a trust, plain an simple, is an entity, a kind of, sort of legal thing, with a distinct and separate existence from its creator. Maybe it will help to compare it to a corporation.
Most everybody knows that a corporation is a separate, distinct legal entity or business. And they know that to form a corporation, the persons who form it–the incorporaters–must follow the law governing corporations in their state–a set of steps, if you will. They must file certain forms, pay a fee, etc. etc. The result will include articles of incorporation and bylaws that spell out the purpose and objectives of the corporation. In the end, the incorporators will have a corporation that is separate and distinct from themselves.
With the corporation in place, the incorporators or owners can now go about doing business through or in the name of the corporation. They’ll probably have corporate checking accounts and credit cards. They’ll probably hold corporate meetings. One or more of the incorporators will probably be CEO, or they may hire someone to be CEO. And on and on. People doing business, but through a separate entity–their corporation. By the way, the CEO of the corporation has responsibilities to the people who created it or own it–the shareholders–and to the people it serves–its customers.
Likewise with a trust, a person–we’ll call her a grantor or settlor–creates the trust by following certain legal formalities governed by state law. The result is typically a paper document called a trust or trust document that spells out the objectives of the trust and the duties of the trustee. Like a corporation, the trust has an existence separate from the person who created it. And like a corporation, that person–that grantor–can do business through the trust. However, to do that, the grantor must name herself or someone else the trustee of the trust–the CEO so to speak. And like a CEO does in a corporation, the trustee has certain powers and responsibilities to the person who created it–the grantor–and to others who will benefit from its existence–the beneficiaries.
The analogy is not perfect because trusts and corporations are not exactly similar, but I hope you get the idea.
Now a Trust in Like a Car
Cars need fuel to run. When you need fuel, you go to a gas station or plug your car into an outlet.
Trusts need fuel as well because if there is not fuel in the trust, the trustee has things to do and nothing to do it with. By fuel, I mean fuel in the form of assets, assets in the form of cash, securities, homes, art, other real estate, bank accounts, and the like. Putting such property into a trust is called funding the trust. How you fund a trust depends on the type of property involved. If you want to fund your trust with your home, then you deed your home to the trustee of your trust. If you want your bank or brokerage accounts in your trust, then you fill out new account cards at your bank or broker, naming the trustee of your trust as the account holder. If you want your life insurance proceeds to be paid into the trust, then you must change the beneficiary to the trustee of your trust. And so on.
Once the property is in your trust–and assuming you are the trustee–life goes on as before. Only this time and only with regard to the property that is in your trust, you act as Jane Doe, trustee of the Jane Doe Trust rather than as simply Jane Doe. When you sell your home, you don’t sign the deed, Jane Doe, trustee of the Jane Doe Trust signs. When you want cash out of the bank, you withdraw as Jane Doe, trustee of the Jane Doe Trust.
Trusts and funding a trust is all about you, but in a different capacity–trustee of an entity separate from yourself.
I hope that’s clear.
Quote for the Day
Those who inherit fortunes are frequently more of a problem than those who made them.
Congolese Proverb
Empty Chamber Indicator — Update
Ok, so in my first post on the Empty Chamber Indicator, I referred rather cryptically to the television production Behind the Scenes, indicating I might report back later. Well, it’s later.
Yesterday I returned to my office to find a phone message from a man asking me to call Michael Alexander, the producer of Behind the Scenes, which, it turns out, produces short informational documentaries to fill a three-minute space on PBS between the ending of one program and the beginning of another. On commercial TV, that space is filled by commercials.
As I mentioned yesterday, the list of people who’d been featured on Behind the Scenes was pretty impressive, including Colin Powell and G.H.W. Bush and many similar personalities from the world of government, business, medicine, you name it.
The phone message said that Mr. Alexander wanted to talk to me about doing a short documentary on estate planning in general, but more particularly on gun trusts (also known as NFA trusts). I was impressed. First, how did they find me? My blog? My Facebook page? LinkedIn? Other sites I’m listed on? I was also skeptical.
And then Mr. Alexander returned my call. Apparently the company’s legit. And they were interested in talking to me about doing a short documentary on gun trusts. Oh, and as part of the bargain, I needed to fork over some dollars.
Now I don’t say this disparagingly. I don’t think I was being scammed. You see, not only did they distribute their short films through PBS–some 300+ stations, according to Alexander–they also would make sure even shorter versions of the PBS documentaries were shown 50 times on any five TV stations I chose in Utah and Wyoming (I’m not sure whether that was 50 total or 50 x 5 or 250 times). And, they would also “narrowcast” the programs to targeted audiences in the Internet. That’s a lot of publicity.
But it wasn’t free. I won’t disclose the terms here because, well, because. Suffice it to say, it wasn’t cheap, though for the right firm at the right time, doing the deal with Mr. Alexander could be a good decision.
Fame is fleeting. Imagined fame even more fleeting. Oh well.
Empty Chamber Indicator
For reasons I may disclose later, I was checking out the website of the TV program Behind the Scenes. I looked at some of the program’s past episodes and guests and quickly realized that Behind the Scenes keeps some good company. I was on site, however, to see what kind of journalism the program practiced. I was particularly interested in how it covered some hot button subjects. Guns, for example.
Watch the brief episode at this link and tell me what you think. If you’re interested in purchasing an Empty Chamber Indicator, the product discussed at that link, go here.